Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Transparency in Marketing

On January 11, the Associated Press released a story by Ashley Heher about Domino's new ad campaign, in which it shares Tweets and what appears to be actual focus group footage of people saying less than kind things about Domino's pizza -- cardboard crust, sauce that tastes like ketchup, flavorless cheese and the like.

We then hear from Domino's President Patrick Doyle that Domino's has heard what its customers are saying and doing something about it by reformulating their pizza.

Ms. Heher's article goes on to quote marketing experts, some of whom offer cautionary tales regarding this kind of advertising and how it might cause confusion among otherwise loyal customers.

I don't know whether these marketing gurus are right (and in fairness, they do not purport to know either, they only cite examples), but I applaud what Domino's is doing.

In social media these days, people talk about brands whether brand management likes it or not. If customers do not like a brand they frequently will say so. So, Domino's cannot keep people's evaluations of its pizza a secret.

How might Domino's manage against this? How might it maintain or grow revenues, when its customers say its product is sub-par?

Traditionally, Domino's strength has been its fast, hot delivery, not the quality of the actual pizza. According to a news segment I watched, Domino's still rates number one in delivery and service. But it is about sixth in pizza quality. Moreover, for the first three quarters of 2009, its U.S. year-over-year same-store sales are down. Fast, hot delivery may not be enough.

Apparently, Domino's management thinks not. So they've let customers know they are listening by sharing with customers what Domino's heard through its monitoring and research. And they have come up with a new and improved product.

I can't tell you whether it really is better. That's for Domino's customers to judge. Whether Domino's is successful in reversing its sales declines remains to be seen. But they deserve credit for listening to their customer’s complaints, publicly acknowledging them and then changing the product in an attempt to fix it rather than just turning up the volume on their advertising. I would like to think that, rather than just a clever ad campaign, this is an example of the kind of transparency I'd like to see from all organizations.

So, I applaud the gesture.

For as most of us who help organizations communicate know, more often than not, the problems they face are not the result of poor communication but of poor products and services. Bravo to Domino's for addressing the core problem rather than the window dressing and for being transparent about it.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Marketer Beware! WSJ Article on Social Media as a Research Tool

Yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, there was an article by By Huaxia Rui, Andrew Whinston and Elizabeth Winkler on how businesses can use Twitter to predict sales. You can read the article at http://tinyurl.com/yftyoqs.

They use the example of three movies on which they tracked Tweets. They imply a correlation between the number of positive Tweets and ticket sales for the movies and write:

"Social-media sites such as Twitter have made it increasingly easy to find out what consumers think and want without the limitations and bias associated with older market-research tools such as surveys and focus groups."

I agree with this statement. But I have a major reservation with it as well.

The only people whose opinions you hear on Twitter are those who Tweet. You don't even get all the people who are on Twitter, let alone all those who are not. The same is true for any other social medium. You only hear from those who speak about that topic through that social medium.

For some categories, such as movies, there may be a relationship between positive Tweets and ticket sales. This may also be true for other categories that have to do with how people spend their leisure time.

But aggregate information from people who Tweet on a given topic can really only give you reliable information on people who Tweet on that topic. If they are the entire stakeholder group you care about, you're golden. But more often than not, they will not be a representative sample of the population you wish to know about.

So, marketer beware!